Getting a better logo #94

Closed
opened 2026-06-25 14:27:25 -05:00 by PPPDUD · 10 comments
PPPDUD commented 2026-06-25 14:27:25 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

After some consideration, I think that it's about time to retire the current Sparkle wordmark (v0.2-present). It's unprofessional and I don't like how it's poorly-written and uses all-uppercase letters.

I will be looking into finding us a better logo for v0.12. Most likely, the new logo will look something like the one for Bonobo:

Image

I have contacted @unconstructable13 to see if they're interested in working on a logo (link to comment).

After some consideration, I think that it's about time to retire the current Sparkle wordmark (v0.2-present). It's unprofessional and I don't like how it's poorly-written and uses all-uppercase letters. I will be looking into finding us a better logo for v0.12. Most likely, the new logo will look something like the one for Bonobo: <img width="374" height="88" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/abc33d08-2203-42d5-a338-8b4fb2dadcd0" /> I have contacted @unconstructable13 to see if they're interested in working on a logo [(link to comment)](https://github.com/OmniBlocks/monorepo/issues/504#issuecomment-4803347282).
PPPDUD commented 2026-06-25 16:01:52 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Update: The new Sparkle logo is here!

Image

It was designed by @unconstructable13 with instructions from me.

@sparkle-devs/developers Does anyone have any concerns with the new logo before I swap out the old one?

Update: The new Sparkle logo is here! <img width="384" height="124" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/598a6f6b-d074-48d9-8032-66f5b3a09c89" /> It was designed by @unconstructable13 with instructions from me. @sparkle-devs/developers Does anyone have any concerns with the new logo before I swap out the old one?
e016 commented 2026-06-25 16:55:52 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I feel like having sparkle and bonobo have almost the same logo makes both platforms a bit too connected; when sparkle is just for snap

I feel like having sparkle and bonobo have almost the same logo makes both platforms a bit _too_ connected; when sparkle is just for snap
codingisfun2831t commented 2026-06-25 17:01:17 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Looks pretty good! I like the slight 3D effect on the wand but having the hand-drawnish lines coming off of it. And the font, still feels a bit happy. Buttt please make it transparent. :)

Looks pretty good! I like the slight 3D effect on the wand but having the hand-drawnish lines coming off of it. And the font, still feels a bit happy. Buttt please make it transparent. :)
PPPDUD commented 2026-06-25 17:05:35 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Looks pretty good! I like the slight 3D effect on the wand but having the hand-drawnish lines coming off of it. And the font, still feels a bit happy. Buttt please make it transparent. :)

It is transparent, isn't it?

I feel like having sparkle and bonobo have almost the same logo makes both platforms a bit too connected; when sparkle is just for snap

This is intentional. Sparkle and Bonobo are half-sister projects (that is, they share many of the same developers and were founded by the same person); furthermore, what is Sparkle but an application-specific version of Bonobo?

> Looks pretty good! I like the slight 3D effect on the wand but having the hand-drawnish lines coming off of it. And the font, still feels a bit happy. Buttt please make it transparent. :) It _is_ transparent, isn't it? > I feel like having sparkle and bonobo have almost the same logo makes both platforms a bit _too_ connected; when sparkle is just for snap This is intentional. Sparkle and Bonobo are half-sister projects (that is, they share many of the same developers and were founded by the same person); furthermore, what is Sparkle but an application-specific version of Bonobo?
codingisfun2831t commented 2026-06-25 17:10:54 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

It is transparent, isn't it?

Ah, it is. Sorry! GitHub uses a different background for images so it didn't look like it

> It _is_ transparent, isn't it? Ah, it is. Sorry! GitHub uses a different background for images so it didn't look like it
codingisfun2831t commented 2026-06-25 17:11:53 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

But also, can we please try to prefer the .svg version for docs? And of course store then somewhere

But also, can we please try to prefer the .svg version for docs? And of course store then somewhere
PPPDUD commented 2026-06-25 17:14:31 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

But also, can we please try to prefer the .svg version for docs? And of course store then somewhere

The logo was designed in OmniBlocks TurboWarp (a Scratch descendant) from my understanding, so the font would look messed-up if we did that.

It is transparent, isn't it?

Ah, it is. Sorry! GitHub uses a different background for images so it didn't look like it

It's alright, don't worry about it.

> But also, can we please try to prefer the .svg version for docs? And of course store then somewhere The logo was designed in ~OmniBlocks~ TurboWarp (a Scratch descendant) from my understanding, so the font would look messed-up if we did that. > > It _is_ transparent, isn't it? > > Ah, it is. Sorry! GitHub uses a different background for images so it didn't look like it It's alright, don't worry about it.
codingisfun2831t commented 2026-06-25 17:17:54 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

The logo was designed in OmniBlocks (a Scratch descendant) from my understanding, so the font would look messed-up if we did that.

Ah, I see. I may be able to redesign it in Inkscape when I get home, maybe (question mark)? I think we should dump the logo versions (svgs, and png versions) into .GitHub, for future info.

> The logo was designed in OmniBlocks (a Scratch descendant) from my understanding, so the font would look messed-up if we did that. Ah, I see. I may be able to redesign it in Inkscape when I get home, maybe (question mark)? I think we should dump the logo versions (svgs, and png versions) into .GitHub, for future info.
PPPDUD commented 2026-06-25 17:24:06 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

The logo was designed in OmniBlocks (a Scratch descendant) from my understanding, so the font would look messed-up if we did that.

Ah, I see. I may be able to redesign it in Inkscape when I get home, maybe (question mark)? I think we should dump the logo versions (svgs, and png versions) into .GitHub, for future info.

Why not put it in doc/ like the screenshot from the README?

> > The logo was designed in OmniBlocks (a Scratch descendant) from my understanding, so the font would look messed-up if we did that. > > Ah, I see. I may be able to redesign it in Inkscape when I get home, maybe (question mark)? I think we should dump the logo versions (svgs, and png versions) into .GitHub, for future info. Why not put it in `doc/` like the screenshot from the README?
codingisfun2831t commented 2026-06-25 17:27:05 -05:00 (Migrated from github.com)

Eh, true. That would be better!

Eh, true. That would be better!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set

Reference
sparkle-devs/sparkle#94
No description provided.